History Coursework – Arab Israeli Conflict

In 1948 the village of Deir Yassin was invaded by Jewish Irgun fighters. By noontide on the same day they had killed every angiotensin converting enzyme in the entire village women and children included. There is no real proof about who is to blest for the Palestinian refugee trouble.The actors of the fight oer Deir Yassin go back since the partition of Palestine. The partition meant that majority of the population, the Arabs, would get less land that the Jews. On the other hand, the Jews did not get Jerusalem, their homeland, included in their ara. both(prenominal) sides were unhappy about the land they were given, so they started to fight each other to get the land back. In December 1947 violence broke out between them and they grew more and more aggressive until massacre itself in April the next year. The Jews thought that if they committed the mass murder, they could gain back the land. Deir Yassin would have been an extremely important strategical point for whoever had control of it. This do the village more valuable to both the Arabs and Jews, which meant it was the centre for violence.The two springs ar written about the same event merely express the opinions of different people. Source A is a pamphlet produce by the PLO describing the Arab exodus form Palestine, and the Deir Yassin massacre. Source b is a statement made to the UN by Israels foreign minister in 1961, expressing her view of the incident and the general exodus of Palestine.As character A is a pamphlet, its obviously propaganda. Its heavily one-sided in the Palestinians point of view. Its advertising the fact that the Palestinians left Palestine be provoke of their fear, and not on their own accord. It blames the whole refugee problem on Israel Thousands of Palestinians fled were prevented from returning to their home by Israel. They had a fair argument because they were forced to leave in fear, as nobody would privation to be slaughtered. As the source is directed towards t he world to strain and get international support, it is obviously exaggerated to make everything sound worse for the Arabs to generate sympathy for them In cold blood Mutilating many of the bodies. Before concluding, one must take into account the fact that the Palestinians do not tell both sides of the story.The source fails to mention the Infitada or uprising, which was the civil disobedience that grew in parts of Israel. It consisted of riots and protests led by Arabs. The Infitada happened before the source was written, so they have no excuse for not writing about it in the pamphlet. They did not want to include the other side f the story as this would lower the amount of sympathy gained by the Palestinians from the world. Also, the UN Resolution 242, which could have solved the refugee problems, and could also be to their advantage, wasnt mentioned. As well as this, the various terrorist acts committed before the source was written arent included in the source, so anyone that reads this source will not presuppose badly of the Palestinians.Although source B is written about the same event, it draws all(a) the attention out from the massacre. As the source is a statement directed towards the UN, it lonesome(prenominal) mentions the facts that Israel wants them to know. The main purpose was to convince the UN to take their side, and stop them from passing resolution 242 which was going to force Israel to withdraw from all their occupied territories. Mrs Meir brings all the attention away from the Jewish actions and tries to turn the argument around. She tries to convince the world that the massacre at Deir Yassin was committed by Jewish Dissidents, or crazy terrorists, not the Israeli government, and slide fastener to do with Golda Meir.The source cleverly accuses the Arab armies for the Arab refugees. It states the all that carried out aggression against Israel are responsible for the refugees. According to the source the Arab leaders who led the armie s told all the Arabs living in Palestine to evacuate the country so the armies could get in, forcing them to live in refugee camps. As with the first PLO source, the writer of this purposely leaves out the earlier Israeli terrorist actions, much(prenominal) as the attacks on the King David hotel in Jerusalem.To conclude, the 2 sources are totally different. They differ in intimately every way, and each source is extremely aslant, the sources are not reliable at all, we preserve only use them to see individual opinions. Neither of the sources either have proof to support the opinions, for example source B tells us that the massacre was undertaken by people who had nothing to do with the government, but the Israelis have no evidence for this, so we have no reason to believe this. The sources give so diverse facts and opinions, it is impossible to draw conclusions about who is to blame for the refugee problem, we can only have our own opinion.GCSE COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENTMODERN valet STUDY THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICTQuestion 2Although sources A-F include a lot of information, it is hard to analyze the sources to make the conclusion of who is to blame for the Palestinian refugee problems. Many of the sources are biased and dont give both sides to the story. The 6 sources give us lots of information concerning the opinions of the different sides, but when it comes to concluding and giving a fair opinion, its almost impossible. We need to analyze each source for their efficiency, and asses them to find out their purpose and reliability.Source A gives us the Palestinian view of the Arab exodus from Palestine. It takes that the Jews invaded the village of Deir Yassin, and because killed the entire population. It says that the thousands of Palestinians who fled Palestine in terror were prevented from returning to their own homeland by Israel. The source blames Israel for the refugee problem. Reading this source alone, one would believe that the entire refugee problem would be the fault of the Israelis, but the source is heavily biased and given in the Palestinian point of view. The source fails to mention a few major details which could help you conclude, such as the intifada that happened when the Palestinians started to fight back against the Israelis, and the various s terrorist attacks they made to try and get their land back. The main cause for the violence was the fact that the British forces left.Source B is written in a similar style as source A, but it is heavily biased and in the view of the Israelis, It is written about the same event, but blames the Palestinian Arabs for the whole refugee event. It basically says that the Arabs actually caused the whole refugee problem, and that the Jewish had nothing to do with it. They say that the massacre at Deir Yassin was committed by terrorists, and was nothing to do with the Jewish government. It says that the other Arab countries told the Palestinians to leave the country so the Arab forces could get in, which would mean that the Jews arent responsible at all for the problem. As with the first source, there is no proof, so we cant believe what is said. Using these 2 sources, theres no conclusion we can come to as they both contradict each other.Source C is an article by an Irish journalist. It contradicts source B, saying that there were no orders at all, by the Arabs, to leave Palestine. This proves source B wrong, and it has proof. It says that there are records in the British museum which say that there was not a single order to evacuate Palestine. It says there were even appeals to extend put in Palestine, which contradicts source B. This source offers evidence and is reliable, and is obviously non-biased. Its hard to tell who caused the refugee when you have two sources telling you that the other is wrong.Source D is an purify from some comments made by Palestinian refugees. They tell us what work the UN did to stop the refugee problem. They say that they have refused homes and other forms of compensation because all they wanted was to be allowed to return to their homeland. This means that the Palestinians are responsible for keeping all the problems, and its their own fault that theyre living in camps. They are purposely being awkward, even though the UN is supporting them. This is an informative factual statement which is slightly biased in the Palestinians favour.Source E is written by the Israeli ambassador to the UN. The source states that if Palestinians colonised elsewhere, the whole problem would stop. It is basically a confirmation to source D. This source pretty much proves that the Arabs are causing the refugee problem.The last source, F, is 2 photos. They say that the Arab was innate(p) in Jerusalem, but cant go back to live there. The Jew was not born in Palestine, but she can return there any time she wants. The Arab and the Jew can still say exactly the same thing20 years later, as their situations are exactly the same, n othing has changed. The source is defiantly not biased as it has the stance of a Jew and an Arab. It doesnt explain the cause of the problem, but it tells us that the problem has not been solved yet.To conclude, these sources do not let you come to a conclusion. Source A contradicts source B, and source C contradicts source B. Sources D and E tell us that the Arabs didnt want compensation and acted awkwardly to annoy the UN, which contradicts source A again. With all the sources saying that others are wrong, and the lack of evidence for sources A, B and E, we cannot believe any of them, or come to any sort of agreement about who really is to blame for the refugee problem. We need more evidence and facts to come to a firm conclusion.

Woman Unknown by Rabindranath Tagore

WOMAN UNKNOWN- Rabindranath Tagore **************************************************************** By P. Baburaj, Senior Lecturer, Dept. of English, Sherubtse college, Bhutan Author of lyric poem and writing, DSB Publication Thimphu Communicative English, P. K. Books, Calicut A perception on Literary Criticism, P. K. Books, Calicut ****************************************************************** ? First soul narrative. ? A 27 year old man namely Anupam who is immersed in Indian tradition and culture. Exposes the Indian culture of the period, master(prenominal) cultural practices, especially arranged marriage and dowry system. ? Breaking away from the stereotypical role for ones rights with tint and understatement. Features ? Prologue ? Flash back(see bluffing) ? Epilogue ? Understatement Prologue-The opening section of a work a kind of introduction which is dissolve of the work and not prefatory. it was common in drama in the 17th and 18th century. Epilogue-Three meanings may be distinguished a short speech to be delivered at the end of a play.It often makes close to graceful and witty comment on what has happened and ask for approval, if not the indulgence, of the audience (b) the end of a fable. Where the righteous is pointed(c)the concluding section or paragraph of any literary work, sometimes added a summary, but more(prenominal) often as an afterthought. Theme-The socialtradition like arranged marriages, dowry system and its evil impacts are discussed in the story. Tagore do a social criticism on the institution of marriage and dowry system in Indian society. The writer exposes the vanity and pompousness of Indian marriages.Setting 1. Anupams house in Culcatta 2. Kanpur,Kalyanresidence 3. Small function in the train Conflicts Internal conflicts? Anupam versus Anupam ? Kalyani versus Kalyani ? External conflicts? Anupam versus uncle and mother. ? Uncle versus ShambunathBabu/Kalyani. ? Anupam family versus the society. ? Stream of anger versus r evenge. ? Stream of love versus forgiveness. There is path here it has been echoing in the mind of Anupam. He lived with that sw eet voice though he had no hope of marrying her,Anupam lived in the faith that she might change his mind one day.But Kalyani dedicated her service to missys education. Anupam is project as a Meek and week man . Usually ladies are projected as shy and nervous, but Kalyani in this story appears as a bold-hearted girl, capable to stand in her own feet and face all the consequences of life and teaches her community to break away from the stereotypical role of an Indian woman. Anupams uncle ? ? ? Very miserly Cunning and shrewd man Behaves like a responsible person involved with all the worries of the family. ************************************

Kinesthetic Learning

When I first read this assignment, I wasnt sure what to expect. I remembered back to when my children were in preschool, which was sixteen and eighteen years ago, and was struck by the realization that I couldnt recall them learning kinesthetically. It seemed to me that the only time I really truism them moving was during designated play time. I was very pleased when I walked into my church preschool, for a day of observing and volunteering, and the first thing I saw was the children learning through movement.In an effort to learn their identification numbers, they were all standing(a) in a large circle, with T for each oneer Karla standing in the center holding a destiny of cards with a number printed on each. She passed a ball to one student and then held up a card with the number four (4) on it, and the midget boy bounced the ball four measure and then passed the ball to the next child, who looked to the teacher for his number, which was a seven (7). He had a little to a gre ater extent trouble and only bounced the ball six times because he forgot the number five.He passed the ball on to the little girl next to him, who looked to the teacher, who still held up the number seven (7), due to the mistake of the previous child. I wasnt sure how that would work, but the little girl bounced the ball seven times, and the boy, responded with Oh yeah, I forgot five. How come you didnt tell me Teacher? Teacher Karla responded to this by explaining that we dont always just learn from the teacher and that we can learn from each other, as well.Later in the day, I was pleasantly surprised to see that teacher Karla was using the Letter Mats that I had created for her a few years ago when I helped out in the preschool. The Letter Mats are large laminated mats with big letters written on them. The letters are non in alphabetical order and each letter is written more than once on each mat. Because this was an activity that I had come up with, Teacher Karla asked me to l ead. I stood in front of the mats and called out a letter. Each child then jumped on that letter on the mat in front of them. I then called out another letter and they jumped from letter to letter.We continued this until they had jumped from A to Z, with a few sess ups in between, but for the most part, most of the children jumped to the right letters most of the time. Chapter 2, Question While volunteering at the preschool, I have a lot of opportunity to watch the way different medicinal drug affects the childrens moods and behavior. I wasnt too surprised by my observations because music has always been something I have love and when I ran an in home childcare, I used different forms of music all of the time. While at the preschool, I observed teacher Karla change the music frequently, depending on the mood she was trying to create.When they were playing the number and ball game, there was lively music playing, with children telling strong and loud. This music seemed to energize the children. When it was art time, and the children were painting, she slowed the music down and, while the children still chatted while doing their painting, they were much calmer than they had been earlier. When we did the activity with the Letter Mats, we listened to children singing the alphabet. The children really enjoyed singing along and I think because it was an alphabet song and coincided with our activity, it helped them stay on focus.

Economics Commentary Essay

The phrase concerns the scathe war in the airline business in China. Air companies sell tickets at demoralize than cost bell to drive let on competitors. The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) pauperisms to prevent this and leave behind set a price floor for seats on 699 flights. In this commentary I allow explain the situation and discuss the consequences of this issue.Air companies try to attract the necessary numbers of passengers to stop their r push throughes from organism canceled by the CAAC. Offering discounts is one of the ways to attract mess to buy air tickets. In this case, discounts of 70 to 80 percents had been offered to consumers over the last few months, while a regulation made by the NDRC and CAAC in 2004 states that airlines should not sell tickets at less than 45 percent of the nominal price. Although this regulation, China Eastern move the price war by still giving these huge discounts which were meant to provoke counterattacks from other air lines. Firms usually want to determine prices to maximize profits and one option is predatory set. Predatory pricing means that firms dress prices below costs to drive out competitors. As soon as firms have driven out competitors, obtained a bigger market share, they raise the prices again.Predatory pricing makes the industry more concentrated, because there a fewer firms in the market. With other words, the market becomes less competitive and more monopolistic. The CAAC tries to prevent this in ball club to keep the air business competitive. Options are price floors, as allow for be explained later. However, travelers are against the idea, as price wars are profitable for them in the hapless run. They can buy relatively cheap tickets now. though the tickets get out be more expensive in future, in the long run. This happens when the firms have driven out their competitors and have raised their prices again. Then producers willing charge higher prices than the normal price and the consumers would therefore be worse off.Although this predatory pricing , also rumors about government intervention made consumers already unhappy. roughly insiders have implied that China Eastern used funds injected by the government to subsidize its losses on ticket sales. The reaction of the CAAC was that the government had injected several billion yuan into China Eastern to maintain its mundane operations, but not so it could cut ticket prices.The reaction from the travelers on the implementation of a price floor was also negative. A price floor means that a government introduce a minimum price that can be charged for a product. With an implementation of a price floor, the supplicate will decrease from Q0 to Qd and the price will increase from P0 to Pmin. The firms which are still in the industry will now charge higher prices at lower outputs. They pay more and get less.If the CAAC decides to implement this price floor it causes that there will be a excess supply, the are a Pmin-(Qd-Qs) . The costs can be higher than the profits and therefore producers will leave the industry. This will lead to a shift in supply and to less excess supply in the long run as shown in estimate 2.Secondly there is a problem with unemployment. By implementing a price floor, unemployment will occur. This is because the supply will shift to left in the long run. There are fewer suppliers and therefore people will get unemployed. People who were working in the area Qd-Q0 will lose their jobs. On the other hand, people who are working in the area 0-Qd will keep their jobs and will gain more. Consumers are ostensibly not happy with this and some people reacted with statements as, We dont want to pay extra adept to fund some senior managers salary, as mentioned in the article.Predatory pricing is a difficult task to prevent, since price floors do not benefit consumers neither in the short run nor in the long run. The CAAC probably needs to find other regulations and restrict ions manners to prevent this vixenish competition.

Bronislaw Kasper Malinowski: Bio-bibliography Essay

A British anthropologist born in Krakow, Po territory, Bronislaw Kasper Malinowsky left his mark in anthropological studies around the world. passim his c arer, Bronislaw dedicate his time to developing methods that dominated preceding anthropological fieldwork. Malinowski is most famously know for founding friendly Anthropology and the view of functionalism. (See Not open Names information Base, The) Bronislaw Malinowski was born April 7, 1884 to m different, Jozefa, and father, Lucjan Malinowski. Lucian was a professor of Slavic philology at Jagellonian University in Southern Poland. Bronislaws mother, born Jozefa Kacka, married Lucjan at the age of 35 in 1883. Although she did not hold any place in the academician world, like her husband, she was part of a family that owned land and held a certain high-ranking status in society. (See Notable Names Data Base, The Bronislaw Malinowski and Wayne, Helena pg.529) When Bronislaw was 14 years old his father died of a heart attack at the age of 58 going him under his mothers care. .The family had been living on Cracow University grounds, but widow and son had to leave this spot and thereafter lived in various flats in central Cracow. They were always rather hard up. A professors pension was not very(prenominal) generous there was, however, some family money. (See Wayne, Helena pg. 530) As a child, Malinowski attended Krakows King John Sobieski public groom. He went by the nickname, Bronio. His mothers cheek of the family being more maternal than his fathers side, Malinowski spent a lot of time with the Kacka cousins. Throughout his years at the public school, and later on during his college career, Malinowski always had a very gangly trunk structure and often was sickly looking. Due to poor wellness, Malinowski frequently had to take time off from school to slow down and not get worse.Malinowski had incredibly bad eyesight and it progressively got worse to the range where he was threatened with blindn ess. (See Wayne, Helena pg. 530 and Notable Names Data Base, The Bronislaw Malinowski) While attending Jagellonian University, during one of his health breaks, Bronislaw Malinowski came across the work of a British Anthropologist, Sir James Frazer (2). Frazers work, The Golden Bough, sparked Malinowskis interest in primitive peoples and about human cultures and society (1). Malinowskis original focus at the college was mathematics and physics. He later decided to broaden his education by leading philosophy and psychology. After receiving his PhD in Philosophy, Physics, and math in 1908, Malinowski went on to study physical chemistry at Leipzig University in Ger many an(prenominal). Then finally, ended his academic studies at the London School of Economics. This is where he received his DSc in 1913 and to a fault earned his PhD in cognition in 1913. (See Notable Names Data Base, The Sir James Frazer, Bronislaw Malinowski) After college, Malinowsky traveled to New Guinea, Austra lia, and Melanesia.Where he began his early on field expeditions and began his well-known work on the Trobriand Islanders. Malinowsky studied their sexual unions, trade, and their religious practices. Malinowski found it just as all-important(a) to observe the people he was studying during their everyday lives as opposed to simply asking the antithetic cultures questions. Malinowski had the idea that people, while under a study, have the tendency to lie in order to fall apart the examiner what they want to hear. It was by observing cultures going about their lives as usual that Malinowski discovered that many previous discoveries made by other anthropologists, such as Lewis Henry Morgan and Sir James Frazer, were very incorrect.These other anthropologists committed a proverbial crime, known today sweeping generalizations. Malinowski discovered that in order to fuck off factual and accurate data on other cultures, an anthropologists couldnt rightfully assume that because one or two cultures have the same characteristic then a similar culture will also hold that same characteristic. This finding also disproved Sigmund Freuds Oedipal Complex theory. Malinowskis practice with extended fieldwork changed the zippy of anthropology forever. (See Notable Names Data Base, The Bronislaw Malinowski)With Malinowskis new approach to fieldwork study, he discovered that these savage cultures were rattling more civilized than they had been given credit for in the past. For example, tribal marriage and religious practices, no liaison how strange or exotic, revealed themselves to be an integral part of the healthy functioning of the community, playing vital roles in trade, community cohesion, and social stability. (See Notable Names Data Base, The Bronislaw Malinowski)Along with his groundbreaking discoveries in fieldwork methods, Malinowski better known for his introduction to the idea of functionalism. Functionalism is a theory stressing the importance of interdepen dence among all behavior patterns and institutions within a social system to its long-term survival. In other words, people in a society take up the social structure in order to function as an individual. (See Free Dictionary Functionalism) Malinowskis idea of functionalism was branched from Radcliffe Browns, another British anthropologist, similar idea called structural functionalism. Malinowski meanwhile placed greater emphasis on the actions of the individual how the individuals needs were served by societys institutions, habitual practices and beliefs, and how the psychology of those individuals office lead them to generate change. (See Notable Names Data Base, The Bronislaw Malinowski) Malinowski married twice.His first marriage was to Elsie Rosaline Masson in 1919. Together they had three children, all girls. Eslie passed away in 1935 after a long disease . Five year later, he married for a second and final time to Anna Valetta Hayman-Joyce, a painter, in 1940. Malinowsk i did not have any more children. Despite being in ill health in 1940, Malinowski continued to do field work. He had begun a new study a study of marketing among the Zapotec of Oaxaca. Mid-study, Malinowsky died of a heart attack, just as his father had, on May 16 1942 leaving behind his successful contribution to anthropology. (See Encyclopedia Bronislaw Malinowski)In todays American society, we are taught that every race and culture is equal. Bronislaw Malinowski taught us this by pointing out cultures same differences. For example, one culture whitethorn turn to magic or sacrificial practices to overcome evil while an American culture might pray to a higher, unknown power. These may seem like two different extremes but they are equally a practice of religion to help cope with uncontrollable forces of the universe.I found it very werwinteresting that, although this may seem like common sense to people today, there was one person who was able to destroy sweeping generalizations an d the idea of a savage culture. With over fifty successful pieces of work, and seventeen print books, Malinowski had four books that were his best known Argonauts of the Western Pacific (1922), Crime and Custom in Savage order (1926), The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia (1929), and finally, published after his death, Magic, Science, and Religion and Other Essays (1948). (See Notable Names Data Base, The Bronislaw Malinowski)

School Vending Machines

Dylan Norwood per. 5 25 2-7-11 Vending Machines Did you devour anything today? No. Well how did you do on the test, not too pricey chasten? I believe that children who atomic number 18nt hungry do better on tests and focus more in school. Studies present that when children eat breakfist they do better in school. Thats true, but kids tend to get hungry right after breakfist. I think vending machines would be a good idea to have in schools having vending machines would allow kids not to starve which willl cause children to focus in school.Well what about more fight on campus or too much children have in class you wonder. Those issues can be considerably resolved by borderting more trash cans where children walk to their classes and also by the vending machine. I think the reason children dont focus in class when theyre hungry is because they focus more on eating at lunch time instead of working on their classwork. If vending machines were at school, kids wont have to keep un til lunch to buy food. Therefore kids wont be hungry during class, and they will focus more in school.You efficacy think that kids will eat too much before lunch, but thats why I mention we put a limit of how much you can buy. How can we do this you might ask? Its aboveboard by using childrens school IDs to buy snacks would only lets them buy snacks three times a day. sensation of the most common issue is what will be in the vending machines. Most concerned parents are worried that schools would put a lot of unhealthy snacks such as cheetos, lays, chocolate, etc. Schools might put these things in the vending machines because it tastes good, and kids will buy them.I permit that it is true the majority of kids dont want to buy nutrient food because it doesnt taste good, but there are some other nutritous food like granola bars, issue snacks, and many more. Parents will always try to think of new problems that concerns vending machines at school. I admit some problems the school might not be able to fix, but what matters most is it does more good than bad. I believe children that arent hungry do better on tests and focus more in school.

Why My Brother Is My Best Friend Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Why My Brother Is My Best champ - Essay ExampleI told him that Aljendro was there. The instructor called Aljendro in the classroom and showed him my blank page of class work. The teacher besides showed Aljendro that I had been missing the classes on the attendance register. Alejandro told the teacher that he would take care of that. The teacher also placed sanction in Aljendro because Aljendro had been holding the first position throughout his education. Alejandro left the class. I was terrified that Aljendro would tell mom and dad, and they would be furious with me to know that I had been missing the classes as strong as class work. I was very upset until I realized that Aljendro did not say a word to mom and dad. It so happened that he came to me in my room to talk to me about the teachers complaint. I had a beautiful and comfortable relationship with him, so I thought not to remain to him. I told him that I was having trouble gaining certain concepts. Aljendro identified tho se areas and personally taught me them with such detail that I grasped those concepts. Aljendro also helped me organize my work by designing a order of business for me. As I had full confidence in Aljendro and wanted to be a position holder for him, I tried my best to quest for his schedule, and it did work for me. A few days later, the teacher once more called Aljendro in the classroom, but this time, it was not for a complaint, but for a reward. The teacher thanked Aljendro for helping me focus on the studies and told the class to clap and appreciate the efforts of an elderberry bushberry bush sidekick for a younger chum.... Aljendro also helped me organize my work by designing a schedule for me. As I had full confidence in Aljendro and wanted to be a position holder like him, I tried my best to follow his schedule, and it did work for me. Few days later, the teacher again called Aljendro in the classroom, but this time, it was not for a complaint, but for a reward. The tea cher thanked Aljendro for helping me focus on the studies and told the class to clap and appreciate the efforts of an elder brother for a younger brother. Aljendro really helped me improve my academic performance. Had he told mom and dad all that the teacher had confided in him, that would have shattered my confidence as well as my trust upon him, but he kept that from happening. I believe that elder brother is always much more responsible for the type of relationship between two brothers, because he is wiser and is looked up to by the younger brother in all aspects. Younger brothers imitate elder brothers, so they of course display rude or nice behavior when they see elder brothers doing either of the two. Also, since elder brother has got more resources and authority than younger brother at any point in time, he is more able to affect the relationship for better or worse. For example, I remember my friend Bob whose elder brother would not let him touch his computer and that made Bob dislike him. My brother was neer like that. Whatever he got, he shared it with me with a view to teaching me newfound things and inculcating new skills in me. From the books to his clothes, Aljendro has shared his every belonging with me, and has really fulfilled all responsibilities of an elder brother. Today, I fundamentally attribute my sense of